Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 31, 2000No. A00A1546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court’s grant of Stephanie Jones’ motion to suppress items seized from her car and purse, contending that the motion did not satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 17-5-30 (b), and that the search was supported by probable cause. We affirm the trial court’s decision.

1. The state contends that the motion to suppress should not have been considered by the trial court because it failed to state facts showing that the search and seizure were unlawful. The state alleges that, as a result of this deficiency, it was unaware of the grounds of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WinnieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Schmidt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. DiSanti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Alex v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. In the Interest of J. D. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Anthony Elvine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Berry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API