Gonzalez v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Presiding Judge.
After a bench trial, Lauro Gonzalez was found guilty of possession of cocaine. He appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress.
In reviewing the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, this Court’s responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision; the evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment of the trial court. Bolt v. State, 230 Ga. App. 760, 761 (1) (497 SE2d 371) (1998).
The only witness to testify at the hearing on the motion to suppress was the arresting officer. He testified that on November…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- LaFontaine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Lambright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Fritzius v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Buck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999