Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Koski v. Kylmanen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1929No. 27,366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 226 N.W. 401, 709. Appellants (respondents below, hereinafter for convenience called defendants) appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

This is a quo warranto action, instituted by information in the nature of quo warranto on the relation of the relators below (respondents here and hereinafter called plaintiffs). They claimed to be the de jure and de facto directors and officers of the Finnish Supply Company (hereinafter called the company) which is and since February, 1914, has been a co-operative association, organized and existing under G. S. 1913, §§ 6479…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Koski v. KylmanenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Dennistoun v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Benson v. KylmanenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Heikkenen v. KylmanenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. HNA Properties v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API