Legal Opinion

Dennistoun v. Davis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1930No. 27,607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C-

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action is one by quo warranto to test the right and title of the defendants to hold offices as president, vice-president, secretary-treasurer, and directors, respectively, of the Redwood County Rural Telephone Company, a corporation. The plaintiffs bring the action as stockholders and officers of the corporation. Dennistoun, Mc-Corquodale and Gunelson claim they are duly elected and qualified directors and officers thereof. Quessenberry was a director at the time action was commenced. The articles of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Evens v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. White River Savings Bank v. Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  4. United States & Canada Land Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Mack v. DeBardeleben Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  2. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. In Re Declaration of Trust by BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of MoundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API