Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Heikkenen v. Kylmanen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1930No. 27,958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Action by quo warranto to test the right of the respondents in the writ to hold office as the directors and officers of the Finnish Supply Company, a co-operative association incorporated und’er the laws of this state. Seven of the relators claim to be the duly elected directors and officers of the corporation and claim -that the respondents have no right or title to the offices of directors in the corporation. For brevity these seven relators will be referred to as plaintiffs and the respondents as defendants.

The question presented is as to which of the two groups were elected…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  2. State Ex Rel. Koski v. KylmanenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Benson v. KylmanenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API