Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Terrill

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1901No. Crim. No. 699PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for a new trial. The indictment is in the following language, to wit: —

“The said Samuel B. Terrill is accused by the grand jury of the county of Santa Clara, state of California, by this indictment, found this 12th day of June, A. D. one thousand eight hundred and ninety-nine, of the crime of forgery, committed as follows: The said Samuel B. Terrill, on the second day of January, A. D. eighteen hundred and ninety-seven, at the county and state aforesaid, with intent to prejudice, damage, and defraud Richard J. Hawke, uttered, published,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. EppingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re RingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People v. TerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API