Legal Opinion
Tidewater Southern Railway Co. v. Merz
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1917No. Civ. No. 1737PublishedCited by 1 opinion
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, together with seven per cent interest thereon from November 14, 1911, upon the following contract:
"Agreement to Purchase Stock.
"I, the undersigned, hereby subscribe for 2000 shares of the common stock of The Tide Water and Southern Railroad Company, a corporation, formed and existing under the laws of California, and having its principal place of business in the City of Stockton, State of California.
"I hereby agree to pay for such stock the sum of $2500.00, one year note, the full par value…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Tidewater Southern Railway Co. v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Quartz Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. JoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaplan v. Reid Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930