Legal Opinion

Gerson v. Sussman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1934No. 24807. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— In the complaint in this case, there are two causes of action, separately stated, each of which is based upon a promissory note. The maker of the notes admitted liability, paid the amount thereof into the registry of the court, and asked that other parties, who were rival claimants to the proceeds be made parties to the action. An order was entered adding as additional defendants Gustave Weissbaum, George I. Weissbaum, and a bank which disclaimed any interest and was dismissed out of the action. Each of the other additional defendants voluntarily appeared and asked affirmative relief.

Before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Demaris v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Smith v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. KernsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bannister v. CavanaughWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harbrecht v. HarrisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Schneider v. Harold H. Schultz, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API