Legal Opinion

Gareis v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Emp. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 1, 1969No. 41635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court.

In an action instituted to recover benefits for a confining disability under a health and accident policy, the trial court, confirming answers to special interrogatories submitted to a jury, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law on the basis of which the judgment for the insured was ordered and entered.

Upon appeal, the issues are these:(1) Is a disease which damages the central nervous system through deterioration of brain cells, thereby resulting in loss of memory, and which may ultimately result in impairment of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Ames v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Sachs v. Commercial Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Crowell v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API