Gareis v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Emp. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court.
In an action instituted to recover benefits for a confining disability under a health and accident policy, the trial court, confirming answers to special interrogatories submitted to a jury, entered findings of fact and conclusions of law on the basis of which the judgment for the insured was ordered and entered.
Upon appeal, the issues are these:(1) Is a disease which damages the central nervous system through deterioration of brain cells, thereby resulting in loss of memory, and which may ultimately result in impairment of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Ames v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Transport Indemnity Co. v. Dahlen Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Sachs v. Commercial Insurance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Crowell v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975