Legal Opinion
Crowell v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1975No. Docket 20070PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. E. Holbrook, P. J.
In September of 1966, Gerald Crowell entered into an insurance contract with Federal Life and Casualty Company. The pertinent portions of that insurance policy state:
"Policy section 3
"D. Total Disability — Sickness Monthly indemnity $200 24 Months for any one Sickness(1) Non-confining or confining sickness(2) Confining Sickness and continued Disability after (Dl) Monthly Indemnity $200 * ♦ Lifetime for any one Sickness
" 'Confining Sickness’, means that as a result of Sickness the Insured is confined to his residential premises or yard, except for necessary visits to a hospital or doctor’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arrigo's Fleet Service, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Struble v. Occidental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Hoffman v. Michigan Home & Hospital Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Cassady v. United Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1974
- Cooper v. Phœnix Accident & Sick Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pennsylvania Life Insurance v. BumbreyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Crowell v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Crowell v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976