Legal Opinion

Kelley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1936No. 7163Published

1Per curiam

There being no reviewable question presented on the record in this cause because the appellant neither requested findings of fact or conclusions of law on the trial of the case nor excepted to any finding or conclusion made by the trial court [Oyler v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 16 F.(2d) 455 (C.C.A.6); Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 30 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A.6); United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 32 F.(2d) 887, 889 (C.C.A.6); Union Bleachery v. United States, 79 F.(2d) 549, 102 A.L.R. 204 (C.C.A.4)],

It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oyler v. Cleveland, C. C. & ST. L. RY. CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  2. Union Bleachery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  3. Thomas E. Basham Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  4. United States v. New York, C. & St. L. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929