Legal Opinion
Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 23, 1980No. Civ. 79-0083PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KASHIWA, Judge. *
This is an action against an insurer to recover no-fault benefits under a Hawaii no-fault insurance policy. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for partial summary judgment and defendant has countered with its own motion for partial summary judgment. I hold in favor of plaintiffs on their motion for partial summary judgment for the amount indicated in the opinion to follow.
The undisputed material facts giving rise to this action are as follows:
1. On or about May 26,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Walton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- Allstate Insurance v. MorganHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mizoguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1985
- Rana v. Bishop Ins. of Hawaii, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hudson v. UwekoolaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.