Mizoguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C.J.
The primary issue in this declaratory judgment action is whether no-fault benefits payable under an additional no-fault coverage endorsement may exceed the aggregate limits established for basic no-fault benefits, in cases where accidental harm has resulted in death. We find that under the terms of the policy at issue and the applicable statutory provisions, the decedent’s surviving spouse and dependents are entitled to payment of survivors’ loss benefits and provable work loss benefits, up to the increased aggregate limits of the additional no-fault coverage.
I
O…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Miller Ex Rel. Continental Mortgage Investors v. Leadership Housing Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Muschette v. the Gateway Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Coll v. McCarthyHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
- Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- Evanston Insurance v. LukoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.