Legal Opinion
Wilson v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 17, 1958No. Civ. 22647PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J. pro tem *
On September 20, 1949, appellant filed his complaint in inverse condemnation against respondent city of Los Angeles which interposed a general and special demurrer and on February 1, 1950, the demurrer was sustained by stipulation with leave to amend in 20 days. No amended complaint was filed and slightly more than seven years later, on March 15, 1957, the respondent city of Los Angeles moved to dismiss the action on two grounds: (1) that the action had not been brought to trial within five years after the filing of the complaint (Code Civ. Proc., § 583) and, (2) that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Baker v. Eilers Music Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harding v. CollazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- California Ammonia Co. v. MacCo Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Sousa v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Harding v. CollazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Harding v. CollazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.