State v. Ford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of two counts of unlawful possession of heroin and was sentenced to a maximum term of 5 years in prison. The main *180issues on this appeal from judgment are whether the court erred in refusing to order the prosecution to produce a government informant as a witness and whether the court properly handled a number of issues relating to the defense of entrapment and a claimed due-process violation. We affirm.
On August 24, 1976, an officer of the narcotics division of the Minneapolis Police Department obtained a warrant to search…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GrilliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bailey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. FolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. SandmoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. HalsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.