State v. Morris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant, who was charged with two counts of engaging in prostitution (offering to engage in sex for hire and agreeing to engage in sex for hire), Minn.St. 609.32, waived her right to a jury trial and was' found guilty by the trial court of both counts. After serving 6 months of a 1-year term in the workhouse under a work-release program, defendant was released. The sole issue which she raises on this appeal from judgment of conviction is whether the conduct of the police officer who arrested her was such that due process bars her conviction. We hold that it was not, and affirm.
The facts are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DankoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. BellfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. CristSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. BurklandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.