Legal Opinion

State v. Folk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1979No. Cr. 664, 667PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Although Mary Folk had entered a plea of not guilty, she did not dispute the State’s allegation that on two separate occasions she sold controlled substances to special agents of the Attorney General’s Drug Enforcement Unit. On May 2, 1978, for $50.00, she sold two quarters of crystal, methamphetamine (§ 19-03.1-07, Schedule II (4)(b), NDCC) to Gerald Kemmet. On May 17, 1978, she sold five bags of marijuana (§ 19-03.1-05, Schedule I (4)(m), NDCC) to Gerald Kemmet and Daniel Smith for $250.00. In spite of Mary’s defense of entrapment, the jury returned verdicts of guilty on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bailey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. State v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API