Legal Opinion
Wolstein v. City of Pepper Pike City Council
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 2004No. 83308PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ann Dyke, Judge.
{¶ 1} Bertram and Iris Wolstein appeal from the order of the trial court that affirmed the Pepper Pike City Council’s denial of their request for variances to construct a wrought iron security fence on their property. Because we are unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On September 24, 2002, the Wolsteins submitted to the city a written request for a variance from the requirements of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Pepper Pike 1468.03, “Fences in Front Yards,” which permits decorative wooden split rail fences that are no higher…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- City of Cleveland v. PosnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Davis v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cleveland Clinic Found. v. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bilton v. Danbury Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.