Legal Opinion

Avakian v. Dusenberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1936No. Civ. 1807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent clerk to issue an execution.

It appears that the petitioners brought an action against five defendants for an accounting and for the recovery of certain trust funds held by said defendants. In the judgment they recovered in that action the court ordered the defendants, and each of them, to deliver to the plaintiffs as agents for a certain committee the sum of $602.18, then on deposit in a certain bank. The judgment then contained the following: “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that said defendants pay over to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hentig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Pista v. ResetarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Welch v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berris & Seaton v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
  2. Oppenheimer v. DeutchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API