Legal Opinion

Berris & Seaton v. Meyers

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 14, 1984No. Civ. A. No. A15973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REESE, P. J.

I. Statement of Facts

and

Proceedings Below

Plaintiff, a law firm, filed separate complaints at different intervals against defendants Cohen and Meyers seeking attorney fees allegedly due and owing by defendants. Approximately one year later, the court granted defendants’ motions consolidating the actions, and authorized the filing of a separate cross-complaint, by defendant Meyers against both plaintiff and cross-defendant Orliss, a former law associate of plaintiff. Defendant Meyers sought judgment against plaintiff only for outrageous conduct. The complaint and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Wilson v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Estate of CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Hentig v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Irvine National Bank v. Kwang-Wei HanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commisson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API