Chester Russ v. Paul Uppah, Rod Cozzetto, and John R. Enright
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Chester Russ appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against his parole officer and two members of his parole board. 1 The district court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because it held that the defendants had absolute immunity for their actions. We agree with the district court as to two of the appellees. We disagree, however, in regard to the third appellee, who we conclude had only qualified immunity. We therefore affirm in part and reverse and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Scotto v. AlmenasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Donald Montero v. Brion Travis, Commissioner Kenneth Graber, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Smith v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Hunt v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.