Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Counsel for Discipline v. Mills
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 2003No. S-02-1085PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
INTRODUCTION
The office of the Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court filed amended formal charges against respondent, Stuart B. Mills. After a formal hearing, the referee concluded that Mills had violated the Code of Professional Responsibility and recommended that Mills be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 5 months. Both the Counsel for Discipline and Mills filed exceptions to the referee’s recommended sanction.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mills was admitted to the practice of law in the State of Nebraska on January 22, 1973. The charges in this case arise from Mills’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. GallnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. ApkerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. FrederiksenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court v. PetersenNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
- STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DISC. v. MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 2003