State v. Roach
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHearn, C.J.
Kenneth Roach appeals from his convictions for multiple drug offenses, arguing the trial court erred (1) by admitting hearsay in violation of the Confrontation Clause and (2) by admitting an in-court identification, which was based on a single photograph lineup, without making a determination as to the reliability of the identification. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 17, 2001, police were involved in a narcotics investigation and went to Roach’s home to execute a search warrant for possession and distribution of crack cocaine. Prior to executing the warrant, a confidential informant, who had prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- State v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008