Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 15, 1985No. 22384PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Chief Justice:

Appellant was convicted of first degree criminal sexual conduct. He alleges prejudicial error in the admission of hearsay testimony against him. We affirm.

The victim told the police her assailant was wearing a dark colored jacket or shirt. She later identified appellant from a photographic line-up.

Appellant’s wife consented to a search of their home. At trial, a police officer who searched appellant’s home testified he was unable to locate a dark jacket. The police officer testified, over objection, that appellant’s wife said appellant owned a dark jacket, but she had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. SherardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API