Legal Opinion

State v. Roach

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2008No. 26446PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Kenneth Roach was convicted of multiple drug offenses and sentenced to an aggregate term of thirty years in prison. Roach appealed to the Court of Appeals, arguing the trial court erred by admitting hearsay testimony in violation of the Confrontation Clause and by improperly allowing an in-court identification. The Court of Appeals upheld the trial judge’s ruling on the in-court identification but found that the admission of the allegedly hearsay testimony violated the Confrontation Clause. However, the Court of Appeals determined the admission of the testimony was harmless error and affirmed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Eastern Distribution, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. RoachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API