Legal Opinion

Forbus v. Knight

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1945No. 29638PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against the defendants to recover damages and to enjoin the continuance of an alleged nuisance threatening further damage to her real property. As grounds for the action, the complaint as subsequently amended alleged that the roots of a certain tree situated on land owned by the defendants invaded plaintiff’s property and periodically clogged her sewer pipe line, causing sewage to back up into the basement of her house; and that such results would recur intermittently unless the nuisance was abated. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in a judgment dismissing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gostina v. RylandWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Stevens v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sterling v. WeinsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Hendricks v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Weihs v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Fabbri v. Regis Forcier, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API