Legal Opinion

Garrett v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 26, 1996No. 73,571PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Landowner initiated an inverse condemnation action, claiming that a city resolution placed limits on the right of commercial access from her property to the street and constituted a taking of the property. The trial court found that a taking of private property had occurred and awarded judgment to landowner. The City of Topeka (City) appeals. Jurisdiction is pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c) (transfer from Court of Appeals on this court’s own motion).

The facts are uncontroverted. In 1988 plaintiff Lena Garrett and her husband, now deceased,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Korytkowski v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of LudlowSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. – GFTLenexa, LLC v. City of Lenexa –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. City of Wichita v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API