Legal Opinion

People v. Jordan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1937No. Crim. 351PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In this action seventeen defendants were charged, in an indictment containing fifteen counts, with a number of violations of sections 286 and 288a of the Penal Code, alleged to have been committed on or about March 13, 1937. Count-J charged all of the defendants with a conspiracy to violate section 288a. Count II charged all of the defendants with á-^onspiracy to violate section 286. Counts III to XIV, inclusive.- each charged some two of the defend-1 '\ ants with a violation of section 288a, and count XV charged two of the defendants with a violation of section 286.

The defendant named in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. MacKenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. KobeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. People v. PustauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API