Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reno
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
This attorney discipline proceeding concerns a Maryland lawyer who purchased and gave a handgun to a person who could not legally possess a regulated firearm.
The State charged Sandra Lynn Reno (“Reno”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, with violating the statute that is currently codified as Md.Code Ann., Pub. Safety (2003, 2011 Repl. Vol., 2013 Supp.) (“PS”) § 5-144. 1 Reno pled not guilty pursuant to an agreed statement of facts, which stated that Reno had given a handgun to Cortney Stevens (“Stevens”), who could not legally possess a regulated firearm. Reno was found guilty,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
3Cited by19 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BasingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.