Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Reno

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 2014No. 5ag/13PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding concerns a Maryland lawyer who purchased and gave a handgun to a person who could not legally possess a regulated firearm.

The State charged Sandra Lynn Reno (“Reno”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, with violating the statute that is currently codified as Md.Code Ann., Pub. Safety (2003, 2011 Repl. Vol., 2013 Supp.) (“PS”) § 5-144. 1 Reno pled not guilty pursuant to an agreed statement of facts, which stated that Reno had given a handgun to Cortney Stevens (“Stevens”), who could not legally possess a regulated firearm. Reno was found guilty,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. FrammCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Attorney Grievance v. HoeraufCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BasingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API