Legal Opinion
Falls County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Haak
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided February 7, 2007No. 10-05-00127-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
Appellant Falls County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 appeals the trial court’s order granting attorney’s fees in favor of Appellees Charles and Lorena Haak. We will affirm.
Background
The Water District filed a condemnation suit against the Haaks seeking to acquire an easement over their property. After filing the original petition, it amended its petition to enlarge the area sought to be condemned. The Haaks filed a Plea in Opposition to the Court’s Jurisdiction alleging that the trial court did not have jurisdiction because the Water District failed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Ragsdale v. Progressive Voters LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Lane Bank Equipment Co. v. Smith Southern Equipment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Paramount Pipe & Supply Co. v. MuhrTexas Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCalla v. SKI RIVER DEVELOPMENT, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- City of Laredo v. MontanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In Re Etc Katy Pipeline, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- Ortiz v. Legal Concierge, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Medina v. Benkiser, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.