Legal Opinion

Paramount Pipe & Supply Co. v. Muhr

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1988No. C-7067PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

These causes concern the validity of two default judgments. Paramount Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. and Winters Flexline Service Company are oil and gas field equipment suppliers. In separate lawsuits (consolidated for argument in our court), Paramount Pipe and Winters Flexline sued Western International Petroleum Corporation and Ulrich Muhr, seeking payment for materials and services furnished in connection with the drilling and operation of oil and gas wells. Paramount Pipe and Winters Flexline also sought foreclosure of mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens.

Neither Western…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Siskind v. Villa Foundation for Education, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Edwards Feed Mill, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re LipskyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  5. Herbert v. Greater Gulf Coast Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API