Legal Opinion
Senatore v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 21, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-0856PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
The Federal Bureau of Investigation hired Plaintiff Holly Senatore as an Intelligence Analyst. As a condition of employment, the FBI requires all new analysts to successfully complete a three-month training course. Senatore, who was diagnosed with a neurological condition at birth, requested various accommodations for her disability before beginning the course. The FBI agreed to nearly all of Senatore’s requests, but denied her requests for an in-class note taker and to use notes on course exams. The FBI denied the former…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cetin v. Kansas City Kansas Community CollegeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Husain v. WarrenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Hylton v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Richardson v. DukeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Turnbow v. Sibley Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025