Legal Opinion

United States v. Michigan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 13, 1980No. M26-73 C.APublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOX, Senior District Judge.

Once again this court is faced with the problem of whether a federal court can enjoin actions of a state court judge. This is an area of the law that a federal judge enters with great reluctance, but one which he must enter if he is to be true to his constitutional obligations. Justice Black in describing the traditional equitable reluctance to interfere with criminal prosecutions stated that comity represents “a system in which there is sensitivity to the legitimate interests of both State and National Government, and in which the National Government,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ute Indian Tribe v. State of UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1981
  2. Bowen v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  3. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  4. United States v. State of Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Grand Traverse Band v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API