Legal Opinion

Grand Traverse Band v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 19, 1995No. 1:94:CV:707PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARTIAL JUDGMENT

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

In accordance with the opinion entered on this date,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (dkt.# 36) filed by plaintiff Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa (GTB) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

The motion is granted as to plaintiff GTB’s treaty-based claim to establish mooring access at the Leland and Northport marinas as herein described, and as to the claim for a declaration that Leland and Northport may not bar the tribal fishers from the access to the Leland and Northport facilities herein described without facing…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Township of Leland Village of NorthportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Township of Leland Village of NorthportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API