Ehinger v. Bahl
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 148, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1902, No. 2448, refusing to take off nonsuit in case of Herman Ehinger v. Sarah W. Bahl. Assumpsit for breach of an agreement by a landlord to make repairs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order of the court refusing to take off nonsuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
Ehinger, the plaintiff, was tenant of defendant’s premises on the corner of Randolph and Master streets, for about six years, from December, 1896, until the 15th of March, 1902; the contract was by parol, from month to month, at a monthly rental of $ 16.00, payable in advance. Plaintiff lived with his family in part of the building, and the remainder he used as a meat shop, in which he kept for sale fresh and cured meats. On the 10th of March, 1902, defendant discovered a crack in the outside wall of tire building, about two and a half feet from the ground, running…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- McKenzie v. EggeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Boyd v. McCartyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Adler v. SklaroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Leon Gabai, Inc. v. KrakovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.