Legal Opinion

Leon Gabai, Inc. v. Krakovitz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1929No. Appeal 68PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We are of one mind in holding that the judgment entered in favor of the defendant in the court below must be reversed, because it was not warranted by the Practice Act of 1915, P. L. 483.

The action was brought by a tenant against its landlord to recover the damages sustained by reason of the failure of the landlord to repair the roof of the demised building upon notice from the tenant, as covenanted in the lease. The sum claimed in the plaintiff’s statement represented the damages to its stock of merchandise resulting directly from defendant’s failure to repair the roof…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Duffield v. HueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Grandin v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Adler v. SklaroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Hardware Mutual Ins. Co. of Minn. v. CA Snyder, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Fred Whitaker Co. v. Cohen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1955
  5. Frangie v. Solomon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API