Legal Opinion
Rieheman v. Cornerstone Seeds, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1996No. 08A02-9602-CV-92PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Ted and Cindy Richeman, on behalf of Natalie Richeman (hereinafter referred to collectively as Richemans) appeal the trial court's order dismissing their claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the Richemans raise one issue: whether at the time of her injury Natalie was employed as a farm or agricultural employee within the meaning of § 9 of the Indiana Worker's Compensation Act (Act).
We reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Cornerstone Seeds, Inc. (Cornerstone) is a wholesale production company which sells seed corn to retail seed corn businesses.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Foshee v. Shoney's, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Doe Ex Rel Roe v. Madison Center HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Fleckles v. HilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Common Council of Hammond v. MatonovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gerlach v. WoodkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Simons ex rel. Estate of Simons v. Longbranch Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Fratus v. Marion Community Schools Board of TrusteesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.