Legal Opinion

Gerlach v. Woodke

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2008No. 93A02-0710-EX-903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Gary Gerlach appeals the decision of the Full Worker’s Compensation Board (the “Board”) affirming the decision of a hearing member, who concluded Gerlach’s employee, Larry Woodke, was eligible for worker’s compensation benefits. On appeal, Gerlach raises one issue, which we restate as whether the hearing member properly found that Woodke was not a farm or agricultural employee within the meaning of Indiana Code section 22-3-2-9(a). We affirm, concluding the evidence presented to the hearing member establishes that at the time of his injury, Woodke was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. MHC Surgical Center Associates, Inc. v. STATE OF OMPPIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Fleckles v. HilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Cavazos v. Midwest General Metals Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Evansville Veneer & Lumber Co. v. MullenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joanna S. Robinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Harris v. United Water Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Charles O'Keefe v. Top Notch FarmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Rocky River Farms, Inc. v. PorterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Sin-Mi Ward v. University of Notre DameIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API