Simkins Corp. v. Gourmet Resources International, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
All defendants, with the exception of Gourmet Resources International, Inc. (“Gourmet”), 1 have filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed as to these defendants.
I. FACTS
This is a diversity action brought by Simkins Corporation (“Simkins”) against six defendants. Of the five defendants who have filed this motion to dismiss, one is a corporation, one is a partnership and three are individual members of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bowers v. NETI Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Derensis v. Coopers & Lybrand Chartered AccountantsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Elbeco Inc. v. Estrella De Plato, Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Educational Testing Service v. KatzmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.