Legal Opinion

Educational Testing Service v. Katzman

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 2, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-3768PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, District Judge.

Educational Testing Service (“ETS”) brings this action against The Princeton Review (“Review”) and its sole officer and shareholder, John Katzman (“Katzman”), alleging copyright infringement and pendent state claims. Katzman, but not Review, now moves for dismissal claiming that this court may not assert personal jurisdiction over him. He claims, as well, that venue is improper. Katzman’s motions will be denied.

I

ETS, a non-profit New York corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey, has developed and administers the Scholastic Aptitude Test…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ent. Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Christie v. National Institute for Newman StudiesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  3. Ragner Tech. Corp. v. BerardiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. Rolo v. City Investing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. Wright v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API