Bayliss v. Murray
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. Action on a promissory note. Answer denying under oatli the genuineness of defendant’s signature to the note. Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEeed, J.
i. pleading. *. warranted: strike: error without prejudiee. I. Plaintiff filed a reply, in which it was alleged that the note sued on was given for the price of a reaping-machine sold by plaintiff to defendant, and that defendant’s signature was signed to the note by an agent who was authorized by him to 0 0 ^ execute the instrument in his name, and that he received and retained said machine. Defendant moved to strike the reply from the files on the ground that the matters therein alleged did not constitute a defense to the matter pleaded in the answer. The circuit court overruled the motion,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murray v. CosterCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kassing v. OrdwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Koht v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Spaulding v. LaybournSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- McClure v. SmeltzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Suntken v. SuntkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.