Kassing v. Ordway
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. A. Van Wagenen, Judge. Action at law commenced against the defendants, Walters Bros., to recover an amount alleged to be due from them for corn sold and delivered.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. A. Van Wagenen, Judge. Action at law commenced against the defendants, Walters Bros., to recover an amount alleged to be due from them for corn sold and delivered. The defendants admitted the purchase of the corn, and that payment for it had not been made, but alleged that the corn was raised by plaintiff on land he had leased from W. W. Ordway, and that Ordway had a landlord’s lien on the corn for unpaid rent, and, in addition, a chattel mortgage, which was also unpaid. They averred that they were unable to determine who was entitled to the purchase…
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The intervener seeks to recover of the plaintiff the amount of five promissory notes made by him, and the value of eighteen and one-half acres of plowing which it is alleged he agreed, but failed, to do. One of the notes is for two hundred and forty dollars, and was given as rent for land which the intervener leased to the plaintiff for the season of *6131893. Another of the notes is for one hundred and ten dollars, another for two hundred and forty dollars, and another for ten dollars. These three notes were secured by a chattel mortgage on the interest of the plaintiff in the crops grown…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bayliss v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- National Bank v. EyreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Nehring v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Eller v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Rudd v. DeweySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Koht v. DeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.