Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Fannie Bomash, Deceased. Julian Bomash, Administrator v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1970No. 24044PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, District Judge:

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue has appealed to this Court to reverse a decision of the United States Tax Court which redetermined a tax deficiency on the estate of Fannie Bomash (hereinafter referred to as “Fannie”).

*310In 1942 Fannie’s husband, Louis Bomash, died. Louis’s will set up a testamentary trust composed entirely of community property. By the terms of the will, 50% of the trust income was payable to Fannie for life and the remainder payable to various offspring. Roughly one-half of the trust corpus consisted of Fannie’s one-half share of the community…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Estate of Spiegel v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Fernandez v. WienerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. Estate of GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Grolemund v. CafferataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Virginia Hughes Chiles, of the Estate of Earle A. Chiles, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Estate of Castleberry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Estate of Wyly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  4. Estate of Du Pont v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  5. Flournoy v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API