Legal Opinion

Virginia Hughes Chiles, of the Estate of Earle A. Chiles, Deceased v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1988No. 86-4328PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

This is a tax refund case for the entire amount of federal estate tax assessed against and paid by the estate of decedent Earle A. Chiles. Virginia Hughes Chiles, executrix of the estate (“Estate”), appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Government. The Estate argues that the unlimited marital deduction for bequests to surviving spouses 1 precludes imposition of any federal estate tax in this case. Alternatively, the Estate claims that the assessment of federal estate taxes in this case violates the Uniformity Clause and the Fifth Amendment of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M. Lee Gallenstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Estate of Fine v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Charles L. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. New Mexico Department Of Human Services v. Department Of Health And Human Services Health Care Financing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. New Mexico Department of Human Services v. Department of Health & Human Services Health Care Financing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API