Legal Opinion

Stanwood v. City of Malden

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 23, 1892PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a petition to recover damages for the discontinuance of a part of Summer Street in Malden, which runs into Florence Street obliquely just opposite the petitioner’s land. The petitioner’s means of access to his estate remain ample, but it is possible, if not probable, that its money value is diminished by diverting the stream of travel which formerly flowed toward it over Summer Street.

The petitioner begins by asking us to overrule Smith v. Boston, 7 Cush. 254, and the cases which have followed it. He cites the English decisions, ending with Metropolitan Board of Works v. McCarthy, L.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. City of East St. Louis v. O'FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. James N. Barbian and Joan L. Barbian v. Constantine Panagis and the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Dantzer v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Buhl v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API