United States v. Iva May Harvey, a Widow
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by 162 individuals from a judgment ejecting them from approximately 27 acres of real property, Harvey’s Fishing Hole, and awarding the government rental value -damages for use and occupancy of this property since I960. 1 Three issues are before us: 1) whether state rather than federal law should have been applied in the jury instruction on the question of accretion; 2) whether substantial evidence supported the jury verdict that Harvey’s Fishing Hole was formed by accretion rather than avulsion; 3) whether the United States was estopped from asserting its…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawrence H. JACKSON, II, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Edward Lunn TullCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- United States v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- United States v. TullDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.