Legal Opinion
United States v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided January 3, 1984No. 80-0801-CV-W-0PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON THE PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSS T. ROBERTS, District Judge.
The United States, on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), seeks an assessment of civil penalties against Amoco Oil Company (“Amoco”), pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1319(d), for alleged violations by Amoco of an NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit regulating the discharge of effluents into the Missouri River in Jackson County, Missouri. The matter comes before me on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment.
A brief factual resume will…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roger Wermager and Lola Wermager v. Cormorant Township BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States of America, and Cross v. Earth Sciences, Inc., and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- National Wildlife Federation v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. One 1973 Buick Riviera Automobile, Vin 4y87u3h548756, James T. LoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Audra SOMMERS, A/K/A Timothy Kevin Cornish, Appellant, v. BUDGET MARKETING, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Chesapeake Foundation v. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1985
- United States v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.