Hartshorn v. Hartshorn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action by Emma Hartshorn against Eugene Hartshorn. Property of defendant was seized and sold under an execution issued on an order of .the Supreme Court allowing plaintiff alimony pendente lite and attorney’s fees, and she moves to confirm sheriff’s ’sale.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
From a decree of .the district court of Oklahoma county denying' plaintiff in error a decree of divorce and alimony, she prosecutes this proceeding. Upon filing the petition in' error with case-made attached in this court,' the defendant in error entered a general appearance herein; and thereafter, on the 16th, day ,of November, 1915, upon application‘ of plaintiff in error, an order was made awarding'to her certain sums as alimony pendente lite, and an allowance for attorney’s' fees in this court. Defendant in error, failing and refusing to comply with said order, upon due notice was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Chase v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Allen v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Dinet v. EigenmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.