Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 3, 1995No. 95SA40PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent 1 be suspended from the practice of law for three years, with certain conditions placed on reinstatement. Neither the assistant disciplinary counsel nor the respondent excepted to the panel’s action. The misconduct committed by the respondent was serious and extensive. Nevertheless, for the reasons below, we accept the panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel entered into an unconditional “stipulation of facts and rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. DulaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. People v. MilnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Vigil v. FranklinColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API