Legal Opinion
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Rothe
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 2001No. Civ.A. 01-1065(RMU)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 11, 2001, John Rothe resigned effective immediately from his job as a financial advisor at Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (“the plaintiff’ or “Morgan Stanley”). Mr. Rothe (“the defendant”) immediately accepted a job with a rival company, CIBC Oppenheimer (“Oppenheimer”), thus setting the stage for a textbook employer-employee dispute about a covenant-not-to-eompete.
On May 16, 2001, the plaintiff filed a verified complaint and a motion for a temporary restraining order and a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Central Trust and Investment Company v. SignalPoint Asset Management, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Hospitality Staffing Solutions, LLC v. ReyesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Coalition for Common Sense in Government Procurement v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.